The reason for my writing
is that the WRPB has decided to cull the large lakes Mask and Corrib for pike. They made a
mess of it by doing so in 1998. For reasons we all know. Pro and many cons. Some say (and
I agree) that by doing so they kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. For fishing for
pike can be done the whole year around, the trout seasons is much shorter. Anyway, I hope
you are willing to listen (to someone from abroad, who does not want to interfere with an
Irish matter, on the other hand though EU funding is used to kill completely healthy
animals, so at least I am entitled to speak my mind on the matter.
I am pretty sure that the pike anglers also wish
to see these wonderful limestone Loughs return to their formal glory; brimful of wonderful
quality brown trout and with a pike population that lives in dynamic equilibrium with the
other fish species in the Loughs. Sorting out the problems regarding entrophicat spawning
redd and nursery stream degradation, along with the proposal implementation of gill
netting programmes of pike stocks will only lead to an explosion of miniature pike. Which
will ironically prey heavily on the trout fry, fingerling populations. With the consequent
scientifically proven end result of no large adult pike population to forage on the small
destructive jack pike (all be it sexually nature) at between 1-3 lbs. weight, which
readily taken the flies of the trout fishermen and predate heavily on juvenile trout
stocks. Thus by doing so undermining all the nursery stream enhancement work so badly
needed.
What the situation currently requires I think is
the judicious use of drum nets (which selectively target and capture pike up to approx.
5lbs in weight) to be raced in the nursery streams, in the mouths of streams and rivers
and in the bays into which these natural streams flow.
Along with this programme, it is critical to put
into effect an "intensive care" programme to nurse back to good heath those
spawning nursery streams. That can be enhanced in the short term for greatest recruitment
of juveniles to the Corrib Mask/Carra system for the minimum expenditure of materials,
labour etc. in order to maximise scarce E.U. resources. Also, the voluntary (?)
implementation by the trout anglers of a "bag limit" and "catch and
release" programmes. Particularly during the vulnerable bricin (minnow) pre trolling
season and may fly dapping season will dramatically turn around the fortunes of the trout
populations. This can be clearly evidenced by way of close study of (anglers catches in
the two seasons post to the rod-licence dispute had ceased, when anglers and fishing clubs
around the great lakes reported huge increase in "trout returns"... (When a
friend tells me about a last year held trout festival, where Mr. (anti pike lobby) R.
O'Grady wins the first price with 12 (rather dead) trout (approx. weighing at least a good
15 lbs.). The nrs. 2 and 3 had 21 fish in between them. And all other anglers caught trout
that very day!.. Then everybody will understand and should agree that these practises will
never help the trout stocks in years (even if we would be able to kill every single pike
on these lakes...). Maybe Irish trout fishermen should first start to consider to release
more of their catch instead of killing every fish that takes their fly. Catch and release
as it is practised all over the globe.
Were the pike populations on a hunger strike
during the two seasons of this earlier mentioned "rod war" ?? No of course they
were not. With the tremendous increase in people leisure time, the large unemployment
component in the population of the west of Ireland. Great advances in fishing tackle
technology (in particular the use of sonar/fish finders by some commercially orientated
trout trollers), better boats and engines and not at last a far greater knowledge and
understanding of the target species we are interested in, namely trout. There is a far
greater exploitation of trout stocks (indeed for all fish) by man now than ever before on
these great Loughs.
The above state of affairs spells ultimate doom
for the trout populations as well as for the pike, because all the great angling writers
of years gone by: Henri Cholmundeley Pennel, John Biekerdyke, Alfred Jardine, R.B.
Marston, J.W. Martin (The Trent-otter), W.M. Senior (Red spinner), H.I. Regan (Dunne) and
not to forget many great Dutch, French and German writers. They were all devoted and
dedicated trout fishermen. But they also loved fishing for pike on the great Loughs of the
West: Conn, Carra, Mask and Corrib. They reported that they did meet out there in their
articles, when making their regular pilgrimages to the West. From the 1850 's to the
1930's approx. Where they enjoyed excellent brown trout fishing on the western Loughs, as
well as a superb fishing for 'monster pike'.
I am sure you will agree Mr. Quigley that it is
only since man's interference since the early 1950's with the establishment of the I.F.T.
and laterally the Regional Fisheries Boards and the C.F.B. with the expenditure of
resources on an on-going, relentless culling programme of pike stocks that the dynamic
equilibrium of the more than wonderful Loughs has shifted. Shifted in the wrong direction.
The complete inertia by the W.R.F.B. in recent years in tackling the pollution
eutrohication problems which was clearly signalled by Dr David Santillo of Greenpeace in
1995(!?!) report... The sheep-overgrazing situation (another hurrah for the E.U.) on upper
Corrib/Mask catchment along with the destruction of spawning redd/nursery stream habitat
have all contributed to the poor recruitment of juvenile trout stocks over tile past
years.
To blame the pike for all this is only fooling
ourselves on a scale only humans are able to and making an environmental scape-goat of the
pike. This fully allows the W.R.F.B. and the C.F.B. to wiggle of the hook (pardon the
punch..) and not to be made accountable for the wasting of scarce financial and human
resources in their complete mis-management of these unique environments.